Melissa Sexton, CFA is the head of Product and
Investment Risk for Morgan Stanley MS +1.21% Wealth Management. Prior to this,
she spent nearly a decade serving as Chief Risk Officer at two different hedge
funds in New York. Most of Melissa’s 25 years of experience has been in a
variety of risk management roles, though she has
also traded derivatives and worked in operations, and has continuously worked
on projects which integrate risk management with information technology. Ms. Sexton is a member
of PRMIA New York’s steering committee, received a BA in Mathematics and
Economics from Boston University, and was awarded her CFA charter in 2001.
Christopher Skroupa: You started your career in
risk management in the 1990s, a decade notable for rapid changes in information
technology combined with extraordinary growth and development of financial
products. How have these changes affected the risk management function over
your career?
Melissa Sexton: The changes have been
significant and continue to be. When I started in the field, the most
sophisticated financial instrument was an exchange-traded option – a
standardized product with fully transparent pricing and contract terms.
Software for standardized products can be commoditized and developed fairly
quickly, but products with multiple triggers and non-standard underlyings meant
that technology and risk models needed to be flexible and much more complex.
And risk managers needed to be knowledgeable not only about valuation models
and the nuances of different financial markets, but needed to have more of an
enterprise view of risk. The risk function in the early nineties was largely
focused on managing market and credit risks, but the massive growth of
over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, also known as off-exchange trading, led to
increased counterparty, operational and liquidity risks. It also led to a need
for enhanced Know your Customer (KYC) controls, which support a business in
verifying the identity of its clients, to manage reputational risk.
Skroupa: Can you compare and contrast your
previous role of chief risk officer at a hedge fund with your current role
managing investment and product risk at a large, complex organization like
Morgan Stanley Wealth Management?
Sexton: In many ways, the roles are quite
similar because most risk management positions require a blend of quantitative
and financial expertise, technology and communication skills. It will always be
essential that risk managers are able to influence behavior. But the biggest
difference I experienced while working at hedge funds was the emphasis on
stress testing and liquidity risk management – both fund liquidity and asset
liquidity. This is because of the higher leverage employed in most hedge fund
strategies and the prevalent use during the financial crisis of gate
provisions, which limited the amounts clients could withdraw from funds. I
worked closely with clients during this hectic period which gave me insights
into their unique needs and circumstances.
At Morgan Stanley Wealth Management (MSWM), we
are also focused on individual client needs and circumstances, but the size and
scale of this business differs materially. With more than 16,000 financial advisors and approximately $2
trillion in client assets, we need to focus on clients and their accounts, but
also financial advisors, financial markets and the multitude of investment
products and solutions we offer. Continue reading…
The risk function in the early nineties was largely focused on managing market and credit risks but the growth of over the financial crisis of gate provisions i experienced while working at hedge funds liquidity and assets liquidity risk management. nice article thanks for sharing information post!.
ReplyDeleteRegards
nebosh in chennai
nebosh-courses-in-chennai/>nebosh course in chennai
Industrial safety course in chennai